• Subiect: „The question of liberating the Banat from the Austro-Hungarian domination in order to integrate it into the national Romanian territory was taken up before Romania entering the war in 1916. After the war, the Banat practically was confronted with another occupation, the military Serbian one, even if the province had proclaimed its union with Romania, together with Transylvania. ˝The Parisian Peace˝ began for the Banat with the promise of a (SerbianRomanian) partition, with the reality of a (Serbian) military occupation, and the expectation of a whole (Romanian) province. That territorial question entered the agenda of the Supreme Council, the decisional forum within the Paris Peace Conference, on the 31st of January the moment the Romanian delegate (Ion I. C. Brătianu) and the Serbian ones (Nikola Pašić, Anté Trumbić and Milenko Radomar Vesnić) were heard. The Banat case was integrally presented, from historical, geographical, strategical, demographical, ethnical and ethical points of view but from contradictory positions: Brătianu was asking for a help within the Treaty of 1916, whiles the Serbian delegates asserted their availability in making a compromise: the province scission.”
  • Limba de redactare: română
  • Vezi publicația: Banatica
  • Editura: Muzeului Banatului Montan
  • Loc publicare: Reşiţa
  • Anul publicaţiei: 2017
  • Referinţă bibliografică pentru nr. revistă: 27; anul 2017
  • Paginaţia: 609-622
  • Navigare în nr. revistă:  |<  <  28 / 42   >  >|