Căutare Avansată

Caută în Domenii

Căutare Detaliată

Curtea de Argeş în trecut şi astăzi: interes ştiinţific internaţional vs. confuzii şi impostură autohtonă. Vestigiile din Biserica Domnească Sf. Nicolae în trei ipostaze - (o necesară punere la punct)

  • Subiect: Curtea de Argeş Past & Present: International Scientific Interest Vs. Autochthonous Confusion & Imposition. - the Vestiges from Saint Nicholas Princely Church in Three Hypostasis The history of the Princely Court, Curtea de Argeş – from which the town & the houses of worship, Argeş I (the 13th century) - Argeş II (c. 1365- 1369) will get the name – paid a tribute for a while to the historical tradition, namely to the myth which claimed that it was founded by a person coming from Făgăraş, called Radul Negru Voievod; the myth was blown away a century ago by the scholar Dimitre Onciul. It was also believed that the tomb of Negru Vodă was found; actually the tomb belonged to the lord of Wallachia, who was also the founder of the Church Argeş II, Vladislav I sau Vlaicu Vodă (1364-c1377), whose tomb (aka M10) was discovered by Virgil Drăghiceanu (31 VII 1920). The author of this paper presents an expositive article having three sections – the last of which being a necessary reply to the affirmations & allegations from a an unwonted article, written by a weird trio (s. supra, n.18; a forced alternative, consequent to, N.B. the intention of the authors to research/ identify through foreign expertise the DNA of the person found in M10, an approach stopped by the authorities in the summer of 2012!!?).
  • Limba de redactare: română
  • Secţiunea: Arheologie
  • Vezi publicația: Argesis - Studii şi Comunicări
  • Editura: Ordessos
  • Loc publicare: Piteşti
  • Anul publicaţiei: 2015
  • Referinţă bibliografică pentru nr. revistă: XXIV; anul 2015; seria Istorie
  • Paginaţia: 9-46
  • Navigare în nr. revistă:  |<  <  2 / 31   >  >|